INDO-CARIBBEAN ALLIANCE, INC.
  • Home
  • Programs
    • Benefits Assistance >
      • Covid-19
    • Legal Services
    • Culture + Education
    • Space for Rent
  • About
    • Board Members
    • Donate
    • Blog
    • Resources
  • Contact Us

2011 in Review: Top 10 Moments for Indo-Caribbeans in NYC

12/30/2011

9 Comments

 
10)  A growing nightlife takes hold  

A vibrant nightlife is emerging with the addition of several new nightclubs, bars and restaurants. Becoming a club promoter, dj and a local socialite is an attractive route for many of our young people.  However, there are increasing reports of assault, drunk driving and health concerns caused by smoking of hookah within these establishments. 


9)  A park in the sky

An exciting, grass root movement involving numerous stakeholders is taking shape to advance the proposal to transform the old rail tracks in South Queens into beautiful green, recreation space.  Revitalized after the success of the Highline in Manhattan, the proposal is expected to offer significant benefits to residents, businesses and to the overall quality of life. We are proud to see Indo-Caribbeans involved in this transformative initiative!

Picture
8) Turning point at the Phagwah Parade 

This year the parade proved once again that it is perhaps the single biggest event in South Queens in its ability to attract both crowds and controversy.  With a new sheriff in town at the 106th Precinct, police officers apparently received directions to confiscate abir (powder) from parade-goers without discretion.  While the rules about the use of abir along the parade route have been relaxed since the anthrax scare after 9/11, this year saw a clear tightening.  The parade organizers bravely sided with the NYPD, while promising to negotiate more cultural sensitivity at the 2012 parade. 



7) Placing a bet on South Queens 

International gambling giant Genting opened their New York outlet at the Aqueduct Racetrack to huge crowds and guarded-optimism from local residents.  Even before their doors opened, the powerful lobby for full-scale gambling began to gather pace.  The social impact of this project will be better known in 2012.     



Picture
THE COURIER/Photo by Ricky Casiano
6) Welcome to Richmond Hill  

A new sign welcoming folks to Richmond Hill was unveiled in front of Sybil’s Restaurant on Liberty Avenue with the slogan “A Community with Pride”.  Long a site for sore eyes, the triangle was beautified and, accordingly to the sign, it was donated and will be maintained by local business owner Romeo Hitall and his family.  While some detractors were surprised to see Mr. Hitlall’s civic side many were equally surprised to learn that the project was in the works for several years. 




Picture
5) Hosay…what?

We saw, in many cases for the first time, the once-popular Muslim tradition of Hosay in its full grandeur. As part of their annual Kitchrie Festival, the Rajkumari Cultural Center pulled out all the stops to honor and revitalize this Trinidadian contribution at a two day spectacular with the iconic Unisphere as the backdrop.  Kudos to the artistic vision at Rajkumari as they prepare to move into their new space on Liberty Avenue in 2012.




4) Hindus sing the blues

What started as an inconspicuous attempt to build relationships between Richmond Hill’s Hindu and Sikh communities ended on the front pages of the Wall Street Journal. The dispute started when neighborhood resident Rohan Narine proposed screening the critically-acclaimed film Sita Sings the Blues at his Mandir followed by a private hall only to be rebuffed each time by a few ultra conservatives. The screening ended up being in his living room where a lively, open discussion with the film’s director and local activists ensued.  Many were stunned and left to wonder, did conservatives just hijack this particular issue or is this the signal of what will be a growing trend for the community and is there an underlying perspective that Caribbean Hindu’s are step-children to an RSS vision of Hinduism?

Picture
3) More than just talk   

Billed as the only Indo-Caribbean talk show, "Let’s Talk with Lakshmee" hits its stride in 2011. The show, hosted by Lakshmee Singh, focused heavily on contemporary issues confronting New York’s Indo-Caribbean and South Asian communities. From politicians, to religious figures, to musicians and important events–the show had it all.  Combined with a new set design, it’s no wonder the show was picked up in Long Island and even more importantly, it airs in Guyana.


Picture
Uli Seit for The New York Times
2)    Revamping John Adams & Richmond Hill 

The overcrowding problems are nothing new, but the performance of both major high schools in the community, John Adams and Richmond Hill, are among the lowest in New York City.  In many cases, graduation rates barely surpassed 50% and attendance among many Indo-Caribbean teenagers is inconsistent, parental involvement is among the lowest and partnerships with local organizations and the schools are few. Some cite the reluctance of the DOE to hire local teachers as another problem. Either way, major changes are expected in 2012 and it’s not clear whether this will be beneficial for the students. 



1)    Drawing Electoral Districts   

Activists, community organizers and political aspirants are enthusiastically waiting for the redistricting taskforce (LATFOR) to share their maps of the new State district lines. A long-time gripe of the community, several local organizations and individuals actually testified at hearings over the summer advocating for fairer representation for the community. With elections scheduled for next year and Governor Cuomo promising to veto LATFOR’s proposals, a protracted battle is expected.  Nonetheless, there is a broad expectation that representation for the community will be conceded and some are even preparing to fight for it.   

------
Please let us know if we forgot something. Share your feedback, add to the list and/or repost.

The list is only meant to spark discussion and reflection. In the interest of full disclosure, we explained our participation in different events while we intentionally excluded ICA's core initiatives to offer an objective perspective.  

9 Comments
Nanda
12/31/2011 09:25:58 am

Did you seriously watch the Sita Sing the Blues movie? Are you okay with a woman portraying Lord Rama as a man who kicks his pregnant wife and rides her back? Why are Hindus called fundamentalist when they speak up against blatant eye-pass against their religious belief? In no part of The Ramayana did Lord Rama ever hit his wife so where did this paley woman get that from?

Reply
Kamelia link
1/2/2012 07:50:38 am

Hi there Nanda. Did you watch the film and if so, how do you feel about Paley using the Ramayana? If you didn't view the film, do you believe you can accurately describe its plot and how it affects the portrayal of Mother Sita and Lord Rama?

I'm curious to know if you believe other Hindus should view the film Sita Sings the Blues? Does you believe it affects an individual's faith in their Hindu religion?

I'd love to hear your feedback to these questions. You seem to be quite passionate about this topic.

Reply
Nanda
1/3/2012 11:39:48 am

Hi Kamelia, What everyone is focusing on is that we are criticising the "Movie" and NOT WHY WE ARE CRITICISING IT. Again read what I wrote and you will see that I am upset because Paley showed LORD RAMA---GOD KICKING HIS PREGNANT WIFE AND RIDING HER BACK!!!! Could she not make the movie without that? My question is how can she study the Ramayana as she claims she did and come up with Lord Rama kicking Seeta Ma? This is my objection. Have seen this "Movie" since it first came out and have been objecting to these portrayals and no one wants to focus on what I am objecting to, rather they are only focusing on the fact that I am objecting. It is obscene to show God kicking His Wife---do we want people who do not know about Lord Rama and Sita Ma to come out with the conclusion that the latter used to beat his pregnant wife?

Reply
Kamelia link
1/3/2012 02:52:52 pm

Perhaps the film screening and discussion which challenged both the film's controversial content and usage of the Ramayana does not exactly fit your statement that "everyone is focusing on that we are criticising the "Movie" and not why we are criticising it."

Who is the "We" you are speaking for? And does your placement of quotes for "Movie" suggest the film is not really a movie but a target against Lord Rama and Seeta Ma?

I do believe you hold a valid point in saying that the director did have an option in leaving certain obviously controversial scenes out of the film.

However, the film is animated and this may hold a major part in the way non-Hindus view the film: That it is not a work of Hindu scripture or Hindu text. As a non-Hindu, to come out from this film with a negative view of the Hindu religion is actually quite the contrary. The New York Times praises it for 2D animation and the Chicago Sun Times calls it "astonishingly original." The subject of the film's use of the Ramayana does not exactly come into play by those who are viewing it from a removed perspective. This may be a negative for Hindus if anything and a positive work of animation for those viewing it.

The scenes, including those controversial, were drawn from Paley . Paley seems to have included her interpretation and personal experience of the story. In this film, Paley defends her work by stating the Ramayana played a part in her own journey to India and recovery in her broken relationship. In your opinion should anyone be allowed to interpret the Ramayana? Should that person not use or reproduce elements of the Ramayana if it offends those who hold it sacred.Who is to determine what is sacred and what isn't?




Reply
Nanda
1/4/2012 01:34:10 pm

Sita Sing the Blues is done by paley after she said she studied the Ramayana. Now I wonder, if as you say--when she shows Lord Rama kicking a pregnant Sita and riding her back comes from her interpretation and experience of the story which I assume you mean the Ramayana....she has to be the first person to have come to such a conclusion. Have been trying to see which other person/writer have depicted Lord Rama as kicking his pregnant wife and riding her back.--found none so far. How she can come to such a conclusion is utterly amazing. Many many Hindu women have been dumped by their husbands, not paley alone and none have taken revenge by denigrating Lord Rama or Sita Ma--nor would they even go to such lengths.

No one is doubting paley's ability with animation, no one would object to work done on the Ramayana but it is grossly disrespectful to show God kicking His Wife. And just so you know, paley's "movie" has been discussed on many many sites especially Hindu ones. I am just one who happened to read this page and so have voiced my objection again here...

Reply
Kamelia link
1/5/2012 02:57:03 pm

I think that many conclusions can be drawn from the film Seeta Sings the Blues. With that said, Paley attempted to humanize both Rama and Seeta after relating to Seeta's character in the Ramayana. This humanization has become a major issue for those who deem Rama and Seeta as Gods.

In my opinion, the kicking of Seeta in the film by Lord Rama can be visually controversial to many Hindus and rightly so. It brings about feelings like, "How could she [Paley] use our Gods in that way?" and "Why would she choose to tarnish their sacred characters?"

However, that same scene can also represent an emotional hurt felt by Paley that was able to transfer to the audience in the animated film by Paley's satirical way of showing physical abuse. You have an excellent point that many women do indeed get dumped by their husbands and it is a painful process. And yet these women do not make films depicting another culture's gods and goddesses in a de-humanizing way. A way that portrays them as anything less than perfect.

Yet in a world of changing ideas, multiple interpretations of a single text, and freedom of intellectual thought, this concept may appeal to many people both Hindu and non-Hindu. Being able to relate to a character in a text on a very human level can be valuable as a story and lesson, much more applicable than any idea of impossible Earthly perfection which only the divine can attain in a world of Satyug not Kalyug.

Nevertheless the use of a sacred text for many is controversial and can be deemed "grossly disrespectful." Tarnishing Gods that so many individuals look up to and worship is a sad and horrible thought for many. And many Hindus believe Paley has done this with her film. This notion is something that I can completely understand. It is not an easily fathomable to think of your Gods as anything less than perfect and you shouldn't have to if that is not your will.

Yet the film continues to be screened and as you mentioned, continues to be discussed on Hindu forums and non-Hindu forums worldwide. It is a widely debated film with numerous viewers. There were many hardships and outrage from some Hindus through some controversial scenes in the film, Yet the discussions brought about by Sita Sings the Blues has also unraveled a new awareness and zeal for Hinduism and the Ramayana coming from a deep questioning of the text and what it really means. For many young people, the film has motivated them to actually open up the Ramayana and learn what it means for themselves.

The discussion for me has proven to be invaluable and has reminded me of one of the greatest things about Hinduism: Peace and Understanding. And peace can only be achieved through discussion.

Thanks for discussing with me!



Reply
MK
6/29/2012 03:52:52 am

Nina Paley, had she wanted to make a moved based on a woman's experience should have chosen Rebecca as her model of a woman. If she or anyone else can't understand why this movie made by a non-Hindu is so offensive to non-Hindus then they know nothing and understand nothing of the Ramayan. Ram and Sita are our biggest symbols of moral values and for someone to disparage that and humanize them is beyond crude. Animated or not Paley is representing the Ramayan, one of our holiest texts and it would be difficult for anyone to not associate this movie with the Ramayan. It is utterly disgraceful that this is the movie Narine used to try to 'bring communities together.' It was tasteless move and he should have known he won't win fans in the Indian community this way. I'm happy the Hindu community reacted to this slap in the face by showing their strength.

As someone on the Times blog commented, had his motive been to bring communities together he could easily have changed the movie.

Reply
Hot Tub Repairs El Monte link
9/23/2022 07:23:11 pm

Greaat read thankyou

Reply
Yorba Linda Friends link
5/23/2024 11:53:27 am

Thankss for this

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    ICA Blog 

    Archives

    December 2021
    December 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    December 2014
    August 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    July 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    December 2012
    September 2012
    July 2012
    April 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    December 2010

    Categories

    All
    Elton Dharry
    Empire State Of Mind
    Ez Jet
    Gala
    Honorees
    Hookah
    ICAGALA
    Indocaribbean
    Indo Caribbean
    Indo-Caribbean
    Indo-Caribbean Awards
    Liberty Avenue
    Richmond Hill
    Tulsi Gabbard

    RSS Feed

Location

Indo-Caribbean Alliance
131-12 Liberty Avenue (cellar)
Richmond Hill, NY 11419

Connect 

[email protected]






​Copyright © 2024 Indo-Caribbean Alliance, Inc. We are a registered 501(c)3 nonprofit organization in New York, United States of America. All rights reserved.

  • Home
  • Programs
    • Benefits Assistance >
      • Covid-19
    • Legal Services
    • Culture + Education
    • Space for Rent
  • About
    • Board Members
    • Donate
    • Blog
    • Resources
  • Contact Us